Many of us in southeastern Ohio have come from one Christian tradition or another, which means we have been taught something regarding baptism and its role in salvation. Baptism is a topic that raises many questions. Therefore it is important for us to take some time to answer those questions by looking at how God’s Word deals with the issue of baptism.
Before beginning a discussion on baptism we must recognize that there has been historically, and is today, a strong difference of viewpoint among evangelical Christians regarding this subject. The position advocated by Oasis is that baptism is not a doctrine that should be the basis of division among Christians, but it is nonetheless a matter of importance for ordinary church life, and it is appropriate that we give it full consideration.
The position I will speak from in this message is a position that I believe to be consistent with the whole of the teaching of Scripture—namely, that baptism is appropriately administered only to those who give a believable profession of faith in Jesus Christ.
The Mode and Meaning of Baptism
The practice of baptism in the New Testament was carried out in one way: the person being baptized was immersed or put completely under the water and then brought back up again. Baptism by immersion is therefore the “mode” of baptism or the way in which baptism was carried out in the New Testament. This is evident for the following reasons:
(1) The Greek word baptizo means “to plunge, dip, immerse” something in water. This is the commonly recognized and standard meaning of the term in ancient Greek literature both inside and outside of the Bible, and this is the word that is always used in the New Testament writings when discussing baptism.
(2) When you consider the meaning of “immerse” it is the most appropriate word for the context of how several New Testament narratives regarding baptism are worded. For instance, in Mark 1:5, people were baptized by John “in the river Jordan” (notice it uses the word “in” and not “beside” or “by” or “near” the river). Mark also tells us that when Jesus had been baptized “he came up out of the water” (Mark 1:10). The text specifies that he came “out of” the water. The fact that John and Jesus went into the river and came up out of it strongly suggests immersion, since sprinkling or pouring of water could much more readily have been done standing beside the river, particularly because multitudes of people were coming for baptism. John’s gospel tells us, further, that John the Baptist “was baptizing at Aenon near Salim, because there was much water there” (John 3:23). Again, it would not take “much water” to baptize people by sprinkling, but it would take much water to baptize by immersion.
Additionally, when Philip had shared the gospel with the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8:36 it says, “as they went along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, ‘See, here is water! What is to prevent my being baptized?’” Apparently neither of them thought that sprinkling or pouring a handful of water from the container of drinking water that would have been carried in the chariot was enough to constitute baptism. Rather, they waited until there was a body of water near the road. Then “he commanded the chariot to stop, and they both went down into the water Philip and the eunuch, and he baptized him. And when they came up out of the water the Spirit of the Lord caught up Philip; and the eunuch saw him no more, and went on his way rejoicing” (Acts 8:38–39). As in the case of Jesus, this baptism occurred when Philip and the eunuch went down into a body of water, and after the baptism they came up out of that body of water. Once again baptism by immersion is the only satisfactory explanation of this narrative.
(3) The symbolism of union with Christ in his death, burial, and resurrection seems to require baptism by immersion. Paul says,
Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life. (Romans 6:3–4)
Similarly, Paul tells the Colossians, “having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.” (Col. 2:12).
This truth is clearly symbolized in baptism by immersion. When a person goes down into the water it is a picture of going down into the grave and being buried. Coming up out of the water is then a picture of being raised with Christ to walk in newness of life. Thus, baptism very clearly pictures death to your old way of life and rising to a new kind of life in Christ.
The Subjects of Baptism
The pattern revealed throughout the New Testament is that only those who give a believable profession of faith should be baptized. This view is often called “believers’ baptism,” since it holds that only those who have themselves believed in Christ (or, more precisely, those who have given reasonable evidence of believing in Christ) should be baptized. This is because baptism, which is a symbol of beginning the Christian life, should only be given to those who have in fact begun the Christian life.
We see evidence for this in the New Testament when after Peter’s sermon at Pentecost we read, “Those who received his word were baptized” (Acts 2:41). The text specifies that baptism was administered to those who “received his word” and therefore trusted in Christ for salvation. Similarly, when Philip preached the gospel in Samaria, we read, “When they believed Philip as he preached good news about the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized both men and women” (Acts 8:12). Likewise, when Peter preached to the Gentiles in Cornelius’ household, he allowed baptism for those who had heard the Word and received the Holy Spirit—that is, for those who had given persuasive evidence of an internal work of regeneration. While Peter was preaching, “the Holy Spirit fell on all who heard the word” and Peter and his companions “heard them speaking in tongues and extolling God” (Acts 10:44–46). Peter’s response was that baptism is appropriate for those who have received the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit: “Can any one forbid water for baptizing these people who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” Then Peter “commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ” (Acts 10:47–48). The point of these three passages is that baptism is appropriately given to those who have received the gospel and trusted in Christ for salvation.
In addition to these indications from New Testament narratives that baptism always followed immediately upon saving faith, there is a second consideration that argues for believers’ baptism: the outward symbol of beginning the Christian life should only be given to those who show evidence of having begun the Christian life. The New Testament authors wrote as though they clearly assumed that everyone who was baptized had also personally trusted in Christ and experienced salvation. For example, Paul says, “As many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ” (Gal. 3:27). Paul here assumes that baptism is the outward sign of inward regeneration.
Is infant baptism Biblical?
If baptism is a personal response, and outward sign of the regenerating power of the Holy Spirit to bring a sinner which brings a sinner to repentance, then it is difficult to believe that this would have been true of infants. Paul could not have said, “As many infants as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ,” for infants have not yet come to saving faith or given any evidence of regeneration.
Paul speaks the same way in Romans 6:3–4: “Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death.” Could Paul have said this of infants? Could he have said that “all infants who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death” and “were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead”? But if Paul could not have said those things about infants, then those who advocate infant baptism must say that baptism means something different for infants than what Paul says it means for “all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus.”
A similar argument can be made from Colossians 2:12: “You were buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead.” But it could not be said of infants that they were buried with Christ, or were raised with him through faith, since they were not yet old enough to exercise faith for themselves.
The Effect of Baptism
Since Jesus commanded his church to baptize (Matt. 28:19), we would expect that there would be a measure of blessing connected with baptism, because all obedience to God by Christians brings God’s favor with it. This obedience is specifically a public act of confessing Jesus as Savior, an act which in itself brings joy and blessing to a believer. Additionally, it is a sign of the believer’s death and resurrection with Christ, and it seems fitting that the Holy Spirit would work through such a sign to increase our faith, to increase our awareness of death to the power and love of sin in our lives, and to increase our experience of the power of new resurrection life in Christ that we have as believers. Since baptism is a physical symbol of the death and resurrection of Christ and our participation in them, it should also give additional assurance of union with Christ to all other believers who are present.
Since water baptism is an outward symbol of inward spiritual baptism by the Holy Spirit, we may expect that the Holy Spirit will ordinarily work alongside the baptism, giving to believers an increasing realization of the benefits of the spiritual baptism to which it points.
We have used language that suggests baptism symbolizes regeneration or spiritual rebirth. But does it only symbolize? Or is there some way in which it is also a “means of grace,” that is, a means that the Holy Spirit uses to bring blessing to people? Is there something in baptism itself that can cause us to say, “A person is not saved until they have been baptized?”
When baptism very closely accompanies someone’s initial profession of faith and is in fact the outward form that profession of faith takes, there is certainly a connection between baptism and receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit. Peter said this on the day of Pentecost, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2:38). Moreover, Paul says, “You were buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the working of God, who raised him from the dead” (Col. 2:12). The statement that it is “through faith in the working of God” that this happens reminds us that there is no magical property in the act of baptism itself, which causes a spiritual result to come about, yet the verse also indicates that when faith accompanies baptism there is genuine spiritual work in the life of the person being baptized.
The Necessity of Baptism
Is baptism necessary for salvation? The answer is both “yes” and “no”. Huh? While we recognize that Jesus commanded baptism (Matt. 28:19), as did the apostles (Acts 2:38), we must be careful not to say that baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation. Why not? Because baptism is an act of your will; you do it. And the Bible is abundantly clear and consistent that salvation is by grace through faith alone, not by works so that anyone can boast (Eph. 2:8-9). To demand that baptism or any other action is necessary for salvation is to say that we are not justified by faith alone, but by faith plus a certain act or work, namely the act of baptism.
Another reason why we mustn’t argue that baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation is that our justification from sins takes place at the point of saving faith, not at the point of water baptism, which usually occurs after a person has faith. Seldom do we ever see a person desiring to be baptized for no reason at all. Baptism is an appropriate response to saving faith.
So, though baptism is not absolutely necessary for justification to take place in a person’s heart, it is necessary if we are to be obedient to Christ, for he commanded baptism for all who believe in him. This describes why we answered both “yes” and “no” to this question. It is the same reason we would answer yes to the question, “Is it necessary to love others in order to be saved?” or “Is it necessary to forgive others in order to be saved?” or “Is it necessary to pray in order to be saved?” or “Is it necessary to read or listen to God’s Word in order to be saved?” The fact of the matter is that all true believers will be baptized. It is as much a part of being saved as any of the things mentioned above.
Two Remaining Questions Regarding Baptism
1. Should churches be divided over baptism?
In spite of many years of division over this question among—not only the Romans Catholics and Protestants, but among Protestant churches themselves—is there a way in which Christians who differ on baptism can demonstrate greater unity of fellowship? And is there a way that progress can be made in bringing the church closer to unity on this question?
One way to move forward could be for those who have differing views on baptism to concede that the act of baptism in and of itself is not a major doctrine of the faith, and that they are willing to live with other views on this matter and not allow differences over baptism to be a cause for division within the greater body of Christ.
In the church (particularly Oasis) we have an “open hand” and a “closed hand” when it comes to theological issues. In the closed hand are beliefs and teachings that such as: the Trinity, the inerrancy of God’s Word, man’s sin and depravity, Jesus is the only way to salvation. In the closed hand are the issues we will not bend on. We will go to war for these things. But in the other hand, the open hand, are issues that we hold a strong conviction about, but we allow for differences of interpretation. These are issues such as: worship style, frequency of taking communion, charismatic or non-charismatic, eschatology (views of the end times). Likewise, in this open hand is where baptism would be held. Yes, we have a strong conviction regarding baptism, which you have seen from this teaching. But we respect the liberty of others to hold onto different convictions than us, and we still regard them as brothers and sisters in the Lord Jesus.
2. Who can baptize?
Some wonder about the qualifications for performing a baptism ceremony. Does it need to be an ordained pastor? Can a woman do it? Can a teenager do it?
As with anything we try to answer, we should look first to God’s Word. In doing so we will see that Scripture simply does not specify any restrictions on who can perform the ceremony of baptism. However, another consideration is this: since baptism is the sign of entrance into the body of Christ, the church (1 Cor. 12:13), then it seems appropriate that it be done within the fellowship of the church, and by someone who is in the fellowship of the church.
Questions for Personal Consideration
Have you been baptized? When? If you were baptized as a believer, what was the effect of the baptism on your Christian life (if any)? If you were baptized as an infant, what effect did the knowledge of your baptism have in your own thinking when you eventually learned that you had been baptized as an infant?
If you have not been baptized but would like to be, please contact us at oasis@bethechurch.com.
Recent Comments