Last week I heard an interesting question asked on a radio program and I thought the answer given was tremendous, so I decided when I heard it that I would try and relay it as accurately as possible this week if I found time. Well, I have a few minutes...
The question was on the issue of suffering as it relates to the sovereignty of God, and it went something like this: In the Old Testament it appears that Israel is blessed with health and prosperity for following God, but in the New Testament the call is to participate in the sufferings of Christ. What's up with that?
Just one example:
Dear friends, do not be surprised at the painful trial you are suffering, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice that you participate in the sufferings of Christ, so that you may be overjoyed when his glory is revealed. If you are insulted because of the name of Christ, you are blessed, for the Spirit of glory and of God rests on you. If you suffer, it should not be as a murderer or thief or any other kind of criminal, or even as a meddler. However, if you suffer as a Christian, do not be ashamed, but praise God that you bear that name. For it is time for judgment to begin with the family of God; and if it begins with us, what will the outcome be for those who do not obey the gospel of God? And, "If it is hard for the righteous to be saved, what will become of the ungodly and the sinner?" So then, those who suffer according to God's will should commit themselves to their faithful Creator and continue to do good. (1 Peter 4:12-19)
Here was the answer as best as I can remember it. The question is understandable how someone might come to that conclusion, but it's not quite as simple as it is stated. The reason being because in both the Old Testament and the New Testament the people of God are blessed, and in both the OT and the NT the people of God suffer. In the OT God does show to his historic people, Israel, a high standard and correlation between obedience and blessing. However, over and over and over again in the Old Testament you find passages like Habakkuk 3:17-18:
"Though the fig tree should not blossom, nor fruit be on the vines, the produce of the olive fail and the fields yield no food, the flock be cut off from the fold, and there be no herd in the stalls, yet I will rejoice in the Lord; I will take joy in the God of my salvation."
If a text like that exists in the Old Testament we must then examine it in light of the whole Old Testament and conclude that every time there is prosperity in the Old Testament it is not an end in itself, and neither is prosperity a proof of God's blessing. That's what the book of Job is all about. Job's friends--Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar--are getting it wrong by suggesting to Job that he must have done some terribly wicked things for all the bad things to be happening to him and all of the suffering he was enduring. Job's response to them is profound. He tells them just walk down the streets of the world and you will see people all over the world prospering, and there are good people who are suffering. That's Old Testament. So if you look at it altogether, you see both: prosperity given to obedience, and you also have many obedient people suffering. it is simply up to the sovereignty of God.
What seems to be clear in the New Testament is that God is no longer dealing with a particular ethnic group of people (the Jews) who have a "come and see" religion as they prosper and display to the world what God is like. Rather, it is a "go and tell" religion, which is described much in a "war-like" lifestyle, where we are to lay down our prerogatives, our plans, our desires, our privileges, and our comforts--and take the gospel to the world, show them the path of the cross of Jesus Christ, and tell them of the promise of everlasting joy and life in the age to come.
It is very important for us to understand these differences. The New Testament "people of God", on this side of the cross, are no longer a people of God who are ethnic and political, but we are a people who are scattered among all the nations. And now we display the glory of God in Christ because he has shown his glory most essentially through suffering.
The path to glory for Christ was the path of unjust suffering. As New Testament Christians, that's our path also. Our Lord endured suffering with perfect patience and was exalted to the highest point of glory. And he is our example of how to respond to suffering. That is the whole point of the 1 Peter passage above.
There are people in the church who do not believe that God allows suffering. They view it as cruel or in opposition to His character as a good Father. I disagree. I do not believe that by allowing fallen human beings to suffer that it must compromise God's Goodness or his character as a loving Father. Here is the main reason why.
"The LORD has established His throne in the heavens, and His sovereignty rules over all" (Psalm 103:19). God is sovereign. Which means he is in control. This is what the argument ultimately comes down to. Either He is in control or He is not. I believe the Bible affirms God's rule over all of humankind, over all of His created beings (including Satan), and over all circumstances.
Even though we may not understand (and in fact will not understand) how or why God does many of the things He does or allows the things he allows, I believe He is sovereign, in control, and in some sense the ultimate One who is behind everything. I believe this because that is what the Bible teaches. He does as He pleases (Psalm 115:3), and no one can stay His hand (Daniel 4:35). We don't have to understand it to believe it, and we have no right whatsoever to call God into OUR court of justice. God is just, holy, righteous and loving because that is who He is, and not because He conforms to any standard of ours. God IS the standard, and we must accept it.
I could stop there. But I will share a bit more.
Whenever someone asks the question, "How can you believe that God is loving whenever there is so much suffering in the world?" Or, "How can you believe that a loving God would allow such suffering to take place in the world?" I really believe the greater problem is in those questions. They are the wrong questions. We are consumed with US--with ourselves--so much that we completely miss the point.
The problem those kinds of questions is that they fail to understand the magnitude of fallen humanity and sin. This is a great portion of the gospel that we tend to overlook in our evangelism. God is completely just in bringing disaster and calamity on the world because He is, in fact, just and righteous. We deserve nothing but wrath from Him for our sins, and we should be thankful that He's been as merciful as He has been.
When we receive mercy, that is exactly what it is--mercy. If we never received one ounce of mercy, then what we would be getting is justice. So, for anyone to cry "this is unfair", or, "God cannot be in this suffering or pain because it would not be right for a good God" is to suggest that we are somehow entitled to something. We are not entitled to perfect health. We are not entitled to great wealth and prosperity in this life. Whenever we receive such things it is an incredible act of God's grace and mercy, completely undeserved and completely up to His own good pleasure and sovereign will. he must receive all glory for such things. Likewise, whenever we are experiencing great pain and suffering... God still reigns. God is still glorified, and perhaps even more in our sufferings, as we identify with Christ in them (see 1 Peter 4). And yes, God is still in control. I trust Him. I need not understand why suffering exists. I have a sovereign God who makes everything glorious.
Recent Comments